Friday, July 18, 2008

Understanding the Groundswell

Yesterday, I attended the Internet Strategy Summit here in Portland, which was organized by Steve Gehlen, a former client of OakTree's. The conference was very well attended by the region's most wired, as well as similarly wired attendees from all around the country. One of the more energetic and thought-provoking presentations was given by Charlene Li, Principal Analyst at Forrester Research & most notably, author of Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies. What is "groundswell," you might ask? In a nutshell, it's the phenomenon where people use technology to get the things they need from each other, rather than from corporations. A great and common example of this is the ever-increasing popularity of Craigslist, where millions of transactions are conducted strictly between people with no interjection or influence by corporations.

From an anthropological perspective, this is interesting, of course, but when we start to think about the significance of the groundswell to our industry, to our clients, to our livelihood, there are ramifications we should all be thinking of now. We are living in an age where something like only 28% of polled Americans say that they trust advertisers, while something like ~ 66% of those same polled people say they trust friends, family and acquaintances. If that's true of the world we live in, the conventional methods of online marketing won't succeed. Embrace the groundswell or become irrelevant.

Practical implications for website designers are always emerging, but becoming familiar with social marketing strategies and tools will be necessary. Gone, or going, are the days of static corporate websites--these narcissistic, one-way communication tools that message to consumers, rather than speak with customers. Create strategies that will encourage community, engagement with client products and services, and in the process, increase credibility. When customers can participate in the improvement of a company's products or services, they'll become brand advocates, brand ambassadors.

Many marketers fear the loss of control that comes with implementing a social marketing strategy, but as Charlene Li points out, "Control is an illusion." These days, people don't need to ask for permission to slam a company when its product sucks, or when brand promises are broken. A better bet is to participate in the discussion, or risk becoming irrelevant.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Google Custom Search... How to boost your Google site ranking in 5 minutes or less (guaranteed)!

Well, almost. With Google’s Custom Search API , you can add a powerful site search feature to your website in a matter of minutes. This API allows you to easily create a customized search engine, influencing the results displayed. If you own a company that serves a particular market niche, for example, you can become a central hub for information on that topic, improve the “stickiness” of your site, and increase the likelihood that your users will read information on your site before being whisked away.

Google gives us several ways to control the results that are displayed via a web search. From keyword promotion and demotion, to site inclusion or exclusion, the methods allow for a surprising level of control. For example, if my site visitor performs a standard Google search on “Sharepoint”, my company does not appear in the top few search results. However, if I create a custom search engine centering on the Sharepoint topic, I can choose to display results from my site exclusively (probably not very helpful to the end user), or simply emphasize my site results over others. This means that my site visitor would likely see pages on Sharepoint from my site first, but sees other sites with Sharepoint information after that. Yes, ads are displayed in the free edition, but a business account will only set most people back about $100/yr to remove the ads from results pages. Not bad.

While a Google Custom Search Engine can be a great tool to improve site stickiness and engage your site visitors, they can’t find what isn’t there!

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Annoying Interfaces of the day - Outlook/Word and the grocery store

The Grocery Store:

Why is it at the grocery that we simply adapt to terrible user interfaces? Better yet, why do they even reach the market? Aren't they tested?

Case 1: The self checkout line. You have to run your credit card through a completely separate machine, but have to bounce back to the checkout interface at the end to signal you're done.

Case 2: How am I supposed to know hitting the big green button marked enter INSTEAD of my PIN will allow my card to be run as credit, not debit? I mean - I DO know it from repetition, but they look at you like you have 2 heads if you act confused. If you ask me, we as a grocery consuming culture are all bonkers.

MS Outlook/Word
I am sure you have noticed that Word will red squiggly underline misspelled words for you. Great. But it doesn't do this until you move the cursor off the word. I would think Microsoft, in its business devotion, would have come up with something by now that would allow you to contextually click a word before you've moved off of it and get several close spellings to what you might be trying to type. But nope, all you get is a formatting menu if you right click on a word before the re squiggle shows up.

I dunno, these things annoy me.

Labels: ,

Friday, May 30, 2008

Speaking of SEO

I've found it helpful to think about Search Engines like people. What I mean is, if Mrs Google comes to your site, she is looking in particular places to figure out what your site is about, and then validating the pages against the indications that higher level data gives her. She sees a domain named "www.tatertots.com" and thinks "this might be a site about tater tots". She goes to the home page and sees the word tater tots in several areas. She follows a link title "Tater Tot Ingredient Information" and goes to a page with the url "www.tatertots.com/tater-tot-information.html" - where she finds a page that lists all the ingredients but doesn't say the word "tater tot" anywhere - just a list of food ingredients! The page obviously should have certain basic areas that repeat this phrase or variations of the phrase so that Mrs. Google doesn't feel confused or ripped off.

This is a simplification of course - there are many gotcha issues with seo, such as duplicate content issues, keyword stuffing, spam, link syndication, etc - and Mrs. Google will look at all of these and negative marks against you as an information authority as it regards tater tots. But it gives you an idea of a common sense way to look at search engine optimization.

Labels:

Friday, May 16, 2008

Google Friend Connect

Google has just released a social networking add-on for websites. Here's some info from their press release:

Websites that are not social networks may still want to be social -- and now they can be, easily. With Google Friend Connect (see http://www.google.com/friendconnect following this evening's Campfire One), any website owner can add a snippet of code to his or her site and get social features up and running immediately without programming -- picking and choosing from built-in functionality like user registration, invitations, members gallery, message posting, and reviews, as well as third-party applications built by the OpenSocial developer community.

Visitors to any site using Google Friend Connect will be able to see, invite, and interact with new friends, or, using secure authorization APIs, with existing friends from social sites on the web, including Facebook, Google Talk, hi5, orkut, Plaxo, and more.


We're looking forward to trying it out over here - these features are becoming more attainable for the average site owner every day!

Labels: ,

Friday, May 2, 2008

50 Ways to Identify a VIP

Did you know there are fifty ways to identify a VIP in a restaurant or bar? A VIP being a "very intoxicated person."

The Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) requires restaurants and other establishments to train their wait staff and bar tenders to handle situations where patrons have exceeded their capacity to be safe on the road. The new on-line Alcohol Server Education (ASE) course includes reading, test and videos that mimic real life situations where the server has to make a decision or pick appropriate actions to defuse potentially explosive behaviors.

OakTree built this custom course in Flash using a train ride motif. Each section of the course is represented by a different part of Oregon; beach, mountains, city, desert, etc. Once you've made it to the end of the train ride by successfully mastering the training, you receive your liquor server license good for five years. See the OakTree Digital press release.

One of the fun parts of the project was filming the lessons in Kells and McCormicks. Both were very willing to let us have the actors light cigarettes and spill drinks. We did use union actors for the roles even though several OakTree folks volunteered to get smashed for the part.

Labels:

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

IA Summit '08 - Miami!

The picture - it is just one of the many deliverables on the "Wall of Deliverables" at the IA Summit. Oh and also - special thanks to Puerto Sagua in Miami Beach for providing me some of the best cuban food I've ever tasted.

First off - just to further elaborate on my post about Jared Spool's keynote now that I am typing on an actual keyboard, the discussion of process > methodology > dogma was interesting. Spool's company (firm? consultancy? - sorry, not sure offhand) did a study to try to examine what distinguished successful teams. Their finding was surprisingly that a project's success has nothing to do with how formally their methodology was followed. In other words, all successful teams have a process, but their success had more to do with what he termed "tricks and techniques" - ways they had of accomplishing individual pieces of the project most efficiently - his example was the plumber who banged on a pipe with a chunk of metal to fix a problem. When he asked the plumber how he know to do what he did he said "I didn't" and when he asked him if that was the right tool for the job the plumber said "No". Then he asked him why he didn't go to get the right tool first he said "I didn't feel like going to my truck". In other words, sometimes the efficiency of getting something done, maybe using less than formal methods, sometimes helps the overall project. It maintains a rhythm and pace to the project.

Some more random notes from Jared Spool's session:



  • Best teams don't have a methodology, focused on techniques and tricks

  • Struggling teams follow methodology without results

  • Tsa = "thousands standing around"

  • What inference to make from eye tracking, analytics (he exposed analytics tools as sheerly ways for consultants to have fun. However - he also said this isn't always bad if it is what gets them "to come to the lab"

  • U(ser) (e)X(perience)=vision, feedback, culture

Session: IA Tools/Content Analysis


Semi-random notes:



  • Axure - kick ass prototyping tool

  • Semantic analysis breaks content down to building blocks and allows systems that reinforce business processes

  • Connexor: natural English parser

  • Calais: Reuters service to provide stuff like what you write based on semantic analysis (didn't quite understand this)

This was Matthew Hodgson's session. He went through a case study of doing semantic analysis on some medical information regarding symptoms and treatments in order to codify it and enable the creation of a backend administrative interface that would standardize the input of the data without sacrificing any of the richness of the content. By basic subject/verb/noun/clause analysis of representative samples, they were able to create some basic maps and wireframes based upon the samples - by using the actual words as the nodes on the maps, they were able to map the relationships of the information and create order out of widely disparate sources.


Unfortunately, I need to actually do some work and can't type this up all day - but I do want to get it out there. So here are the rest of my notes with some mild clean up:



FOLKSONOMY SESSION


Exploratory search:



  • hierarchical

  • faceted (set of smaller hierarchies) Flamenco

  • dynamic clusters (dynamic, post_retrieval, unique/clustering algorithms - good example is automation) - Vivisimo is clustering platform, Grokker and Clusty

  • folksonomy - Motivation uncertainties, Activities: searching(cognition), browsing(perceptual) - flat and inclusive structure

USER EXPERIENCE TEAM OF ONE
Leah Buhley(adaptive path)


Generative design
1 Brainstorm a lot
2 ad hoc team
3 pick the best idears


Techniques:



  • Spectrums, continuums and grids (design)

  • Mix and match terms

  • Inspiration library

  • Screen grab(firefox plugin)

Concept sheet:
- description
- draw a pic
- it's like
- it does


Business needs are good, but so are user needs


PLACEMAKING



  • Sociably, uses and activities, access and linkages, comfort and images

  • Map markup 'slams' 'charrettes' (on site)

  • Cheese example - 2 people looking at cheese and also viewing each other's reactions at the same time - triangulation

SEARCH PATTERNS
Peter Morville


Songza
Oskope
Like.com
Live search (msn)
Spime search for physical obj (bruce sterling)
Everyzing


PROTOTYPING


paper!
XML/XHTML
Dreamweaver
Adobe flex
Fireworks
Adobe thermal?
Irise
Axure
Michael Schrage - prototyping books

And finally - if anyone actually read this far, Andrew Hinton's "plenary" (uh I guess that means closing speech), summed up perfectly where IA and UX are today. He had some amusing visuals and some interesting AK-47 metaphors, but what it came down to is that the web has evolved from an extremely hierarchical and abstract organization which was only fully understood by the engineers, now it has become a vast and complex, chaotic being in terms of its physical organization. New interface technologies combined with new ways of interacting socially and users contributing to the meta data of a site provide new opportunities for site navigation and organization. This all is serving to blur the links between user experience designers and good information architects - such that any good ux designer is an IA and vice versa.

Labels: , , , , ,